EMAG

The independent action group for current and ex Equitable Life policyholders, funded by contributions.

Equitable Members Action Group

Equitable Members Action Group Limited, a company limited by guarantee, number 5471535 registered in the UK

Search

Quote of the Week:

“The final judgment: regulators, too, were far from Equitable.

It was worth the wait.

The Parliamentary Ombudsman's report into Equitable Life, which has taken four years to see the light of day, found catastrophic failure on the part of government regulators over a decade and has recommended an apology and a government compensation scheme.

The specific findings of the Ombudsman, Ann Abraham, are damning. In the run-up to the crisis, the regulators were 'passive, reactive and complacent', failing to question Equitable's annual returns, failing to resolve issues over its solvency and failing to establish how it could afford to pay out bonuses. They also allowed its then boss, Roy Ranson, to run the company as a personal fiefdom.

From 1998 to the end of 2000, when Equitable closed its doors, they were aware of problems but their actions were 'largely ineffective and inappropriate,' and they allowed the insurer to remain open on an unsound basis. They let it submit misleading returns, in which its apparent solvency position was flattered by a reinsurance deal which had 'no economic substance at all'.

Most shocking, during 2001 the regulators gave a misleading impression to policyholders and the public by falsely stating that Equitable had always been solvent for regulatory purposes and by giving assurances that it had always met its other regulatory requirements.

I can personally vouch for their complacency: at a lunch only days before the insurer shut up shop, I was shocked when one senior official opined that this would not be such a terrible outcome for savers.

Seemingly, he was impervious to the damage this would cause not only to individual victims, but also to wider public confidence in pensions savings.

Alistair Darling will not respond formally to the report until the autumn but the attitude of this government has been to resist claims for compensation, and to imply that the policyholders were 'well-heeled' and so somehow undeserving - an oddly Old Labour slant on the affair. The company, this argument goes, brought about its own misfortunes, so taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it.

The men who ran Equitable were indeed primarily responsible, though the regulators have let them escape relatively lightly. Ranson was expelled from the actuarial profession last year, but he is in his late seventies and entitled to a substantial free pension from his former employer. On account of his age, he was not punished by the Financial Services Authority.

His lieutenant, Chris Headdon, is serving a six-year ban meted out by the FSA from holding a senior position in the financial services industry. It expires in 2010, quite possibly sooner than the victims will receive payouts. He will be in his early fifties, still young enough to make more money to add to the £95,000 pension he is due to receive from the Equitable staff scheme.

It is true that it will be hard - very hard - for the government to find the £4.6bn or so that policyholder action groups reckon will be needed to pay compensation. The budget deficit for last month was the worst June figure ever recorded, and people are questioning whether the Equitable victims are the most deserving recipients of scarce cash. My view is that compensation should be paid, despite the obvious difficulties.

First, the notion that all Equitable customers are wealthy is not true. The average policy was enough to buy a pension of just £70 a week, not riches beyond the dreams of avarice. If some savers are a bit posh, so what? It doesn't make the persistent failures of the regulators more acceptable. Do people really believe it is OK for City regulators to fail horribly, and for the government to ignore the Ombudsman, so long as wrongdoers only milk the middle class?

Second, the government is not being asked to bail out investors because of the misdeeds of the insurer's management, which would be morally hazardous, but because of the inadequacies of its own departments and regulatory bodies.

Third, if ministers defy the Ombudsman, who provides a vital safeguard for the public, that will be an outrageous show of contempt for her office and its role in holding governments to account. It hardly encourages better regulation in the City if the government flouts its own watchdog.

Ruth Sunderland, The Observer, Sunday 20th July

Latest Additions

  • 22/07/2008 - EMAG’s submission to PO 2 (including redress)

    EMAG was the primary supplier of evidence to the PO’s Report. The EMAG board’s confidential reading committee received the draft report on 23rd February. In the 10 following weeks, EMAG digested the draft and commissioned expert professional opinions from a QC, a leading actuary (Steve Dixon) and commissioned our accountantants, Burgess Hodgson, to make a formal EMAG response. Several of the suggestions were adopted.

    The EMAG section of redress, quantification and how compensation should be administered is reproduced in full in the PO’s final report and is its only reference to the prospective scale of compensation.

    If you read only one document, EMAG suggests it be this one.

    Read EMAG's press release.

  • 22/07/2008 - Parliamentary Ombudsman’s report: “Equitable Life, a decade of regulatory failure”

    PO press release at: http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/news/press_releases/pr2008_07el.html

    The PO's summary 48 pages to download.

    Click here to download PDFs of whole report.

  • 22/07/2008 - The fantastic press coverage

    The coverage by the quality papers has been exceptional:

    See The Daily Telegraph's

    The Financial Times coverage was exceptional.

    But many other excellent and supportive articles in every serious newspaper

    Some correct anticipation in advance of publication. See some of the headlines.

    However, the backlash on nay-sayers against the public purse per The Treasury’s spin is already present.

  • 22/07/2008 - Equitable Life WAS unique

    An oft repeated put-down used against the Equitable sufferers has been that ALL lifcos were over-bonusing and were over-exposed in equities, leading to big decreases in policy values after 2002 (a period outwith the remit of the PO’s report).

    However, the others had shareholders or huge multi-billion pound orphan estates to fall back on and none had Equitable’s concentration on pensions or huge known-by-the-regulators exposure to GARs. Finally, unlike Equitable, none ran a negative “smoothing kitty” throughout the 1990s.

    IF they were all the same, where then are the thousands of complaints against those other companies? Only Equitable has been subject to no less that THIRTEEN REPORTS since 2001. But this new thorough one from the PO is the very first to have Parliament’s authority to address blame and recommended compensation. See the list of Equitable Life Reports.

  • 27/06/2008 - EMAG goes regional!

    EMAG is setting up a network of regional action groups in anticipation that the Parliamentary Ombudsman may recommend compensation when her report is finally published in mid-July.

    Click below to visit the new website and see how to join the campaign in your area. Even if you are already an EMAG member, logging your details on your regional site will enable you to keep in touch with action in your area or perhaps to join the regional team to help promote the campaign.

    www.emagregional.org.uk

    Read more.

    See EMAG’s press release announcement of regional groups.

  • 02/06/2008 - The FSA and its AGM

    On 29th May Lord Adair Turner was confirmed to be the new chairman of the FSA from September, replace Sir Callum McCarthy after five dismal years under his stewardship. The apppointment is welcomed by EMAG.

    Read about Adair Turner’s task in this in-depth article in the Sunday Telegraph, by Katerine Griffiths.

    Sir Callum will have the unenviable task of chairing the eigth annual public meeting of the FSA at the Q E 2 Conference Centre in Westminster on the morning of Thursday 24th July. Do try to attend. Find out how to register here.
    Hopefully, Callum McCarthy will be held to account for the Northern Wreck AND the Equitable, post the publication of PO 2 one week earlier.

  • 02/06/2008 - PO date confirmed

    All MPs returned on 2nd June from their break to a letter from Ann Abraham, in which she confirms her report will be laid before the Houses of Parliament in the week commencing 14th July – just a few days before MPs long summer recess which starts on 22nd July. Read her letter.

  • 28/05/2008 - Vanni and Lizzie

    The Guardian printed an extensive hagiography on the Society’s chairman, Vanni Treves, on 9th May. Read about his charitable works.

    It was heartening to observe that tireless campaigner for Equitable, Liz Kwantes, was honoured with an MBE by the Prince of Wales on May 16th at Buckingham Palace. See http://www.equitablelifemembers.org.uk/

  • 28/05/2008 - Equitable for sale, blah blah

    Predictably, a few days before the ELAS AGM, a raft of newspapers published the oft-repeated leaked story that maybe, just maybe, the Pru might buy the remaining £6.6bn WP fund. We have heard all about the prospective sale, the data room of info and the excitement of interest ad nauseum. The likelihood is that no bidder will proceed until PO 2 is in the public domain for fear of a possible new wave of litigation. So it’s unlikely that the Society will be sold in 2008.

  • 28/05/2008 - Equitable’s AGM, 19th May

    Held with all the usual razmataz in Westminster, with big screen, staging, autocue and computer logging of questions with roving mikes and a cast of probably two dozen, with the senior litigation partner at solicitors Lovells, Neil Fagan, present - why? And for what? Why are there eight non-execs? What do they do? The total number of member attendees was 70 – less than EMAG has ever had to any of our seven AGMs, without any of the gubbins. Equitable’s should have been in a village hall in Birmingham.

    There are about 400,000 people with an ongoing interest in the £6.8bn with-profits fund. Of the 180,000 remaining voting members, approximately 16,000 bothered to vote. About 12% of these voted against the board’s remuneration package. Read the text of the chairman and managing director’s speeches at the AGM.

    The Mail on Sunday’s financial editor certainly has a long knife out for MD Charles Thomson’s £1m remuneration. See his articles on May 11th.

    And, after the event, pointing out the substantial votes against the board’s remuneration motion.

  • 28/05/2008 - TreasCom grilled the FSA, 6th May

    EMAG’s Paul Braithwaite attended the two hour session and observed that Hector Sants acquitted himself well. The most incisive MP was judged to be Labour’s Andy Love who asked such valid questions as:
    Q 108: “Mr Sants, is the FSA independent enough from its contributing member firms to be able to deal with this problem adequately?”

    Q 118: “One final question if I can, Chairman. Mr Sants, you said earlier on, and I agree very strongly with it, that your role is to look after the consumer. Is it the success of the SEC in the United States that there is a perception there that the authorities look after the little guy against what is happening in some of our city institutions, and should not the FSA be concentrating more on looking after the little guy in order that we achieve more success in this area?”

    Find out the answers at the transcipt (towards the end).

  • 03/04/2008 - ELAS 2007 figures

    On 27th March, Equitable Life published its preliminary 2007 financial report. It was much the same story as before. A nominal amount invested equities. The with-profits fund in now down to £6.6bn (run down from £26bn in 2000). The bonus, non-guaranteed, remains the same at 5%.

    Perhaps the most interesting para was this one:
    “During 2008 we have been notified of 78 legal claims lodged in various regional courts in Germany. We will examine these claims in due course and consider them on their individual merits. As usual, we will resist any attempts by policyholders to obtain an unfair advantage at the expense of all other with-profits policyholders.“

    The news was that there was no news. Trailed many times and oft that the remainder would be sold off (and that there’s a queue of bidders) has evaporated into the ether. It’s STILL all for sale. Did not Vanni and Charles promise in November 2006, when they were covered in opprobrium over their disastrous £50m waste on failed litigation, that there was no point in demanding that they go because they’d be gone by the end of 2007? See more deja-vu reporting of the recycled story.

  • 03/04/2008 - The FSA report on itself

    Surprisingly, the internal report by the FSA into supervision of the Northern Wreck, published on 26th March, was particularly self-critical. Download the 12-page executive summary and press release.

    These were the four key failings identified in the supervision of the FSA:

    1. A lack of sufficient supervisory engagement with the firm, in particular the failure of the supervisory team to follow up rigorously with the management of the firm on the business model vulnerability arising from changing market conditions.
    2. A lack of adequate oversight and review by FSA line management of the quality, intensity and rigour of the firm's supervision.
    3. Inadequate specific resource directly supervising the firm.
    4. A lack of intensity by the FSA in ensuring that all available risk information was properly utilised to inform its supervisory actions.

    It must be enormously helpful to EMAG’s cause of claimed maladministration by the FSA to be able to demonstrate that, six years after the Equitable’s problems became public, the FSA continued to fail investors in such chronic fashion. The FSA simply won’t be able to say that “lessons had been learned”. Hopefully, PO 2 will highlight the parallels between Equitable Life regulation and Northern Rock. See just some of the press coverage.

  • 25/02/2008 - In the House of Lords

    From Hansard 18th Feb 2008, Column 26, 3:56pm
    Tory Lord de Mauley:
    “My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating this Statement on Northern Rock. I wish that I could say that I welcomed it, but I do not. I am sorry for the Minister for having to read it, as, indeed, I am sorry for the Chancellor, who is out of his depth and a puppet for a failed Prime Minister—a Prime Minister who created the conditions for the failure of Northern Rock in the first place.

    Can the Minister confirm that the Bill gives the Government power to alter any Act of Parliament applying to banks in the United Kingdom by order? Can he confirm that it gives the power to backdate regulations applying to banks and building societies? Why has the Treasury flung so much money at this company when with, say, Equitable Life, it slunk past on the other side of the road? What is the difference between one financial institution with an over-ambitious business plan and another?”

    Read more.

  • 25/02/2008 - Nice stuff about Dr Cable

    Vince Cable has been the stand-out politician who has had a clear grasp of Northern Rock all along. Incredibly, the chairman of the FSA, Callum McCarthy tried to shut him up in September and accused him of scaremongering.

    Cable has been the subject of extensive press praise, in particular in the Guardian, with as very amusing Parthian Shot: “The government does seem to have an extraordinary search engine, which finds banana skins to fall on."

Click here to Join EMAG Today!

Stop Press